Hillary Clinton: there's a 'game that keeps women in their place' | US news | The Guardian
Ethics: What Hillary Clinton Doesn't Want You to Be Aware of
Hillary would have you conclude that her loss in this last presidential election resulted on account of, in part to misogynistic attitudes in the US population.
The truth is that if a conservative woman had been nominated to run as the Republican Presidential candidate AND if not, Hillary Clinton, but rather Senator Tim Kaine, had been the Democratic Party nominee -- I would have voted for the woman candidate because her values were closer to my values as a conservative Republican voter.
When the late UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher first won her position in 1979, I was 20 or 21 years old. Had I been a British citizen and not an American citizen then, I would have voted for her and not for anyone in the Labor Party, male or female.
How many Caucasian women, including real feminists and not feminazis, who even voted for Barack Obama, voted in this election for Donald Trump despite Hillary being one of the two choices?
In the end, the decision of whom to vote for in this latest Presidential election hinged not on gender, as Hillary Clinton would have you believe, but rather on the values of each of the candidates and the positions held.
For me as a voter, anyone with the valueless creeds that Hillary is famous for, EITHER MALE OR FEMALE, is totally unacceptable as US President.
If you believe that Hillary came closer to your political set of beliefs and whose vision for the country's direction was closer to yours - and that consideration alone is what prompted you to vote for her - then you certainly voted right!
You will have voted according to your own standards and I salute you.
I'm a conservative Patriot whose political beliefs and whose vision for the country were far closer to those of Donald Trump's so I voted for him.
Comments
Post a Comment